PCMan: the real and true Gnome file manager

I have modified this post after several people complained that I was misunderstood: Nautilus can, sure, display a tree view of the file system. Sure, but only for “who-knows-how”.

I do not like Gnome desktop environment because of its excessively simplified GUI that leverages all users as if they lack minimal skill to interact with a computer. And what I dislike most on Gnome is even more oversimplified vision of the file system provided by Nautilus on its default configuration.

Please, the converse is not true: I do not love KDE. And even more disappointing was seeing KDE 4 abandoning its advantages over Gnome just to become similar to Gnome (after a while, KDE 4 will not have anymore its nice power-user features, nor the nice simplicity of Gnome).

Specially annoying is the “Spatial Navigation” that opens a new window for each folder that is accessed (although real [wo]men would call it “directories”). As soon you have more than a bunch of directories, navigating from one to other will open more and more windows on your desktop just to drive you crazy.

Sure, Gnome developers will explain that a typical user will not own more than a hand full of files. And, they will store everything on the same folder like “documents” or “images” (or even on the desktop leading to the result of the picture on the right). They

Screenshot from a user that stores all documents on his desktop folder

Screenshot from a user that stores all documents on his desktop folder

will never store their files in a secure separated partition, nor on a file system over the network. Just in the case that the amount of files gets out of control, the user will create one or other subdirectory here or there. Therefore, subdirectory navigation is not necessary and it is reasonable to display the content of all directories at the same time.

By the way, Nautilus also claims to support file system browsing. Just click “browse” instead of “open” is what they say. However, there are some issues to consider. The “browsing” features are not visible by default. And a feature that is not visible, or that is very difficult to find, in practice, is not a feature at all. There is no preference where the user can easily choose which configuration he prefers. Googling around shows very few references about “nautilus tree view”. Asking experienced Gnome users was of nearly no use.

After reading the entire Nautilus documentation and after getting some good advices from people that read this article, I understood how. The user needs to start Nautilus with the –browse parameter on command line, open any folder with the “browse” command, then go back again to original folder. The, the user needs to display the side pane and select to tree visualization on this pane (it took a while how to figure out that I can change the content shown by the side pane).

Finally, one will be able to see the directory hierarchy and be able to jump to sibling directories. It is possible only to go to/from parent and child directories.

Fortunately, I discovered an alternative that allows the real and true file system browsing. It is called PCMan File Manager, and stays a bit hidden on most Linux distros. At the beginning, it provides an appearance familiar to Nautilus, and understands the same pre-defined folders like “documents” or “images”. However, after a short time of use, one will soon discover the power-user features that are available.

PCMan claims to be extremely fast and lightweight. I do not think this matters most, compared to the features it provides. It has a sidebar with useful and organized common locations and mount points. The sidebar may also display a complete tree view of the file system. Tabbed browsing is also supported.

I liked most that each tab has its own tree view. It was really annoying on KDE/Konqueror that the tree view did not always match the focused tab. The tree view is completely absent in Nautilus. Also I like the organized common locations and mount points. Although Konqueror has something similar, it is not as organized and as useful as it is on PCMan.

Also, there are features I still need to get better acquaintance: mounting/unmounting/ejecting media within PCMan. I really dislike having an icon for storage devices on the Gnome/KDE desktop while not being able to see and manage them within Nautilus/Konqueror.

Other nice feature is opening a directory as root, avoiding the need to switch to a terminal or to log-in as a different user.

However, I was not able to open and browse very large directories, like /usr/bin, as promised by PCMan web site.

8 Responses to PCMan: the real and true Gnome file manager

  1. Douglas Drumond says:

    “There is no tree view of the file system. It is not possible to see the directory hierarchy.”

    Oops… indeed there is a tree view. Just click the “Places” on the left panel and you will be able to choose “Tree”

  2. mpe says:

    I hate to rain on your parade, and I’m not a Gnome fanboy, but ..

    Nautilus can do most of what you whinge about. If you hit F9 or View->Side Pane, you can get a tree view that allows you to see the directory hiearachy and navigate between siblings etc.

  3. willyhoops says:

    i have been trying our gnome today just for fun and although i got a side panel to come up once i just can’t see how to do it again. F9 does nothing, there is no tree on the places menu, and view has no side pane option. shame you guys who think gnome does trees can not be more specific. i tried the online help but it is no good either. the moral of this story is i guess that microsoft are still almost the only players who can write good gui software (vista aside)

    • Daniel Ferber says:

      Hi William,
      I managed to make the view appear by pressing F9 or View->Side bar (or something similar because my gnome is not in English). However, this does not show the tree by default. On the top of the view, there is a label called “places”. If you click on this label, then a menu will pop up where you can choose “tree”. It is not very intuitive. And as far as I now, this is not documented.

  4. Gary B says:

    I’m running Ubuntu. In order to make the option to show the side pane, I had to (a) rummage around the net for a while; (b) in Nautilus open Edit:Preferences, click to the Behavior tab; click “Always open in browser windows”. Then log out completely and log in again. When I logged in again, the sidebar showed up.

    To double check, in a separate console I looked at ~/.gconf/apps/nautilus/preferences/%gconf.xml. In that file there is a line that looks like this:

    It is a mystery to me why this option isn’t always available in the menus. It is not visible unless either the above is done, or nautilus is started from a shell with the option –browser

    I also wonder why ‘Tree View” is not an option in the main pane, along with “List View” and “Icon View”. I do not consider participation in the dumbing down of everything to be an appropriate task for a software designer – especially to a point beyond which MS has ever gone.

  5. Gary B says:

    Oops – the line from the nautilus configuration file was filtered. Here it is without the brackets:
    entry name=”start_with_sidebar” mtime=”1230921736″ type=”bool” value=”true”

  6. Gary B says:

    Now all I have to do is find pcman to try it out… :)

  7. nautilus is a little bit slower then pc man but it can automatically mount the unmounted fs.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: